Blog Figure

Why is it always the Drudge report, Conde and Nast Portfolio or the Enquirer that break news?

Are the networks too busy covering up for the Dems and trying to spin Obama's opposition to the surge and his saying it would fail and lead to more casualties? Will the media keep covering for democrats like Clinton, Obama and Edwards even when they are caught red-handed as with Tony rezko, Rev. Wright and Obama's lies on campaign funding?

Public Comments

1. Oh look, it's the white guy hiding behind the black avatar again. What exactly are these media sources breaking news about? Source please?
2. your whining because another corrupt republican have been caught with his hand in the Cookie jar yamster . lamo
3. Hey Al, why did Obama not visit the wounded troops in Germany? That was your question of the day yesterday. Did you give up?
4. Because they go ahead and report without verifying their sources first, like the networks do. That means they take a greater risk of being wrong. They've just decided to take that risk in the interest of getting a scoop.
5. I seriously think the National Enquirer has hookers on their payroll. I've figured it out. Goes to show you the intelligence of John Edwards, though!!!
6. yes, the national enquirer was indeed right about that one woman who had a baby by an alien werewolf. and drudge report has never been wrong...ever... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drudge_Report#Errors these are all highly reputable news sources..so much so that when one simply hears "drudge report" the first word that pops into one's head is "respected." the second one is "integrity."